What good would it do to have the proposed science debate? I would prefer to have a president who was smart enough to understand what science is and how it works, and most people who feel the way I do already have a pretty good idea about where the candidates and parties fall out in that respect. The rest of the population will gain nothing from a science debate. 75% of us are too stupid to derive any benefit from it, and it will devolve for that part of us into an evolution versus creation, heliocentric versus geocentric and empiricism versus faith debate. There are legions of manipulators who will see to it that it devolves in this manner.
50% of us are too stupid to grasp the notion that the dichotomies set up above are false.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment