Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Musings and rants of an anarchist.
AddThis
Search This Blog
Blogs I Visit Every Day
Blog Archive
-
▼
2007
(386)
-
▼
June
(36)
- Whatever Happened to Judicial Restraint?
- I am not Transgendered, Not That There's Anything ...
- There's Never an Iceberg When You Need One
- Time Preference
- What a Libertarian Government Would Be Like
- A Defense of "Mainstream Libertarians"
- Another Reason to Buy Local
- Dissolve the US!
- Karen DeCoster is Proud of Her Huge Carbon Footprint
- If the Office of the Veep Isn't In the Executive B...
- Psalm Singing
- Ill Fitting Labels
- Quote of the Week
- McMansions Suck
- Vacation's Over
- Off to Virginia Beach/Back on 6/25
- Why Karl Rove is Always Smirking
- You Can Alter Reality With Your Thoughts. Who Knew?
- Yes Indeed, I am a Journalist. Why Do You Ask?
- Quote of the Week
- Libertarians for Collectivism
- "It's pronounced ahs-wee-pay!"
- Alternatives to the Crappy "Debates"
- More Flawed Moral Reasoning
- Flag Day, Schmag Day
- PhDs = Evil
- Historical Precedents for an Attack on Iran
- My Parents Were Right. I Never Amounted to Anything.
- There's Nothing Wrong With Being Negative When the...
- Bugs in Our Morality Modules
- Culture of Poverty
- Immigrants Ruined America
- Pond News
- Big Doings at the Historical Society
- Another Thing to Fret About: Black Death
- Every Generation Makes Idiotic Fashion Choices
-
▼
June
(36)
2 comments:
To support the doctrine of judicial review is to support judicial activism. The differences are only in style and degree. But if we are to accept judicial review at all, surely we must hope that the Court would protect the First Amendment from McCain-Feingold.
James,
That's the one decision I actually agreed with, but this Court has not shown any juridicial consistency. There are at least four complete hacks on the Court.
Post a Comment