Among the reasons that I am never going to be elected to public office, up at the top would be that I inhaled.  Often.  Deeply.  I liked it and I would inhale again if the right opportunity presented itself.  If elected, I would do everything in my power to make inhaling legal, and I will inhale in the halls of power even if it’s not legal. 
Another reason would be that I don’t think that I could claim to be a “hunter” with a straight face.  I don’t enjoy killing animals.  I hate it when I run over anything, even a frog.  I don’t even like to kill bugs.  You have to be microscopic before I will cease having scruples about killing you.  Hunters seem more than a little creepy to me, especially the ones who shoot at fenced in animals released conveniently to be shot.  I don’t advocate restrictions on hunting and hunters.  I just don’t want any part of it, and I wouldn’t be able to don an orange vest and pretend that I was a hunter to score points with some slack jawed yahoos who reckon that you have to be a sadist to get their votes. 
Maybe the hunting claims are back door ways of signaling support for the Second Amendment.  “I not only support the right to bear arms: I exercise it on bunnies!”  I support the Second Amendment.  Period.  I choose not to own firearms or to hunt, but I uphold the rights of others to own weapons and to hunt.   I don’t have to plead the Fifth Amendment to show that I uphold it, so why should the Second Amendment be any different?
Or maybe the hunting claims are signals that the candidate is not a sissy boy.  If so, it’s misguided.  Some of the most dandified fops I have ever known were aficionados of the chase or avid fishermen.  I would put my manliness up against the manliness of any man. I don’t need to kill a quail with clipped wings to show that I am masculine.  If you’re so masculine, Shooty McQuailkiller, why don’t you strangle the quail and bite off its head?  Sure, I’m squeamish about killing things and am afraid of some stuff, like spiders, and I wouldn’t get very far on Fear Factor, but that should in no way detract from my manliness and fitness for office.  Alas, it does.  That’s just the way it is.  I am safe from having public office forced upon me.
Of course, if Mitt Romney can call himself a “hunter” based on his taking a few potshots at some vermin back in the day, then I am a “hunter” as well.  The thing is, Mitt Romney is not, in fact, a “hunter” and neither am I.  Neither is Dick Cheney.
Friday, May 18, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
The hunting claims are the way for the nominee to demonstrate that they are the predators that the sheeple demand.
Post a Comment