Wednesday, October 04, 2006

Teaching Truants a Lesson..... in Evil!

Rogier van Bakel reports on the jailing of a Florida woman for not making her son go to school, even though he is older than the state’s mandatory schooling age: http://www.bakelblog.com/nobodys_business/2006/10/the_parent_trap.html.

I confess that I once served on a Florida Truancy Arbitration Board and meddled in the affairs of families of truants. Some were even old enough to drop out but had not officially done so. Accordingly, they were still truants rather than drop outs, and we could mess with them all we wanted. We never went after the parents, though, because we understood that parents aren’t really able to compel teenagers to do anything. Heck, we had truant foster kids, and the state couldn’t make them go to school either.

We were armed with a procedure known as CINS/FINS (Child or Family In Need of Services). Parents could also file CINS/FINS petitions to deal with their incorrigible children. This procedure had its roots in colonial law where parents could bring their disobedient children before a judge. In colonial Massachusetts, you could even have the judge order your child’s execution. “Son, we’ve tried grounding thee and taking away thy horse, but none of that has worked. So now we have to kill thee. This is going to hurt me more than thee.”

Of course, the state was not really equipped to provide helpful services to families with rebellious children. All we really did was persuade a judge to order the child to be obedient and go to school and to do or refrain from doing any number of things. When they disobeyed the order, they would be held in contempt and put in a juvenile detention facility. We weren’t supposed to use the juvenile detention facilities in this manner, but judges were reluctant to send the contemptuous youths to jail. The children would then languish in the system, being unable to purge themselves of contempt other than by convincing a state social worker that he or she had really learned a lesson and would be good.

This procedure never did any child any good, but it allowed some exasperated parents to take a long break from their troublesome offspring. Wealthier parents tended to put their unruly teens in psychiatric hospitals for long stays, so our CINS/FINS clientele tended to be less prosperous families or folks who had run out money for in-patient psychiatric care. The whole thing was a nightmare for the teens caught up in it. I reckon that too many parents figured that their kids would raise themselves, and they couldn't deal with the results of their negligent parenting.

I was a real jackhole for participating in this idiocy. May God have mercy on me.

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

hello!
i'm italian your blog is beautiful
i have got a blog:
www.superjuventus.blogspot.com
you go in my blog and you write a comment
by

Doc said...

yes - i see your moral dilemma here. The ability to dehumanize your kids ia now an option for lower and lower classes of parent, empowered by a system where the 'adults' are not as intellegent as the youth. When those youth grow up to be the adults, they exploit the system the same way, with a vengance. The third time through, poor kids. If they could dissipate...

...they can. The eldest kid in a family catches all the shit from the concerned parents and the younger kids learn what they can say so that the do doesn't get seen. The rebellious eldest child also doesn't know what is going on with their younger sibling, so when the parent asks the trusted confidant - that knowledge is just as vapid. A second or third chiled in a family (i'm a blind eldest, as is my wife and our eldest son) can be totally manipulative and yet never seem to have problems - the lessons from the peer group of infinite wisdom get played out - all based on hollywood movies and television cartoons that have been endemic since birth.

But with youth becoming unaffordable and unmanageable - the cannon fodder crowd runs their propaganda machine and : well we know that story. But these are odd times. We can forgive past indescretions - and see through past ideology blocks. I think good and evil more of as order and chaos - the total do-gooders are as bad as the total do-badders. Just a question of scale.